Skip to main content

Can medicines be cheaper for Papua New Guineans?


News that matters in Papua New Guinea
Container loads of medical kits in the BPPL warehouse in Port Moresby read for distribution nationwide. - Picture courtesy of The National.

Can medicines be cheaper for Papua New Guineans?

PORT MORESBY: Can the Papua New Guinea (PNG) Government do anything to make pharmaceutical drugs cheaper and better in quality nationwide?

The National Doctor’s Association (NDA) seems to think so, if the procurement and supply of medical kits and pharmaceutical drugs is sourced directly from manufacturers and those recognised or endorsed by the World Health Organisation or the International Dispensary Association.

That means the Government must review and find a more efficient way of sourcing medicines for Papua New Guineans.

It also needs the will to scrap the current way of awarding contracts to the private sector to source medical supply for the country.

PNG Cyber Monitor’s attention on the issue was captured in these reports by The National:

Doing away with awarding of contracts can lower cost of drugs

Main Stories
Rebecca Kuku
LAST week, The National’s reporter Rebecca Kuku looked at the history of Papua New Guinea (PNG)’s protracted procurement and supply of medical kits and pharmaceutical drugs woes and issues. She now focuses on the National Procurement Commission (NPC) and controversial supplier, Borneo Pacific Pharmaceuticals Limited (BPPL).
CAN PNG’s medical kits and pharmaceutical drugs be made cheaper for Papua New Guineans?
That’s the question The National pursued and featured after the National Doctor’s Association (NDA) raised its furore after health secretary Pascoe Kase on Aug 14 announced that BPPL had been awarded two government contracts to supply medical kits and antibiotics valued at more than K100 million.
Dr Sam Yockopua
Yockopua … Generic medicines procured this way will be cheaper and effective.
NDA secretary and chief of emergency medicine Dr Sam Yockopua questioned the Government’s rationale of awarding contracts to the private sector.
“Why can’t the Government set up its own department to procure medical kits and medicine directly, either, from the World Health Organisation (WHO)-certified suppliers, like the International Dispensary Association (IDA) or equivalent, or directly from manufacturers in Asia, Australia, the US or Europe?
“Generic medicines procured this way will be cheaper and effective,” he added.
Last week, The National spoke to the National Department of Health (NDOH), the National Procurement Commission (NPC), Institute of National Affairs executive officer Paul Barker and former health secretary Dr Quentin Riley. The report covered the processes and the person (s) involved in tendering and awarding the contract.
Simon Bole
Bole … tenders go through stringent steps and procedures
We now look at how tender is processed by NPC.
NPC chief executive officer Simon Bole says there are three procedures to be adhered to when processing tender requests:
  • IN awarding contracts, including contracts for the procurement and supply of medicine and pharmaceutical drugs or antibiotics, the NDOH will write to NPC requesting for a tender execution by submitting its bidding documents and specifications;
  • NPC then assesses NDOH’s request and checks to see if NDOH has the funds or whether there is an Authority to Pre-Commit from the Finance Department. When all documents are cleared, the NPC sends the costing for the advertisements, and after the NDOH has made the payment, the NPC proceeds to advertise on behalf of the NDOH. NPC then conducts the open and close tender with the NDOH after six weeks.
  • NDOH then goes through its evaluation and assessment exercise to submit its recommendation to NPC. Upon receiving the recommendation accompanied by all the required documents, the NPC will submit the request to the Technical Finance Evaluation Committee (TFEC) which is made up of technical advisers and senior officers from state solicitors, NDOH, Works, Finance and NPC officials.
“The NPC Board and CEO is not part of the TFEC. The evaluation report from the TFEC is then given to the NPC CEO who then gives it to the NPC Board which is made up of the finance and works secretary, officials from the finance minister, state solicitors, an engineer, an accountant and a civil society representative.
“If the contract is below K10 million, then the board approves it and NPC writes up the contract and sends it to the state solicitors for legal clearance. After this is done the contract is signed.
“But if the contract is worth more than K10 million, then NPC sends the recommendations to the state solicitors for legal correction and the works department for technical correction before submitting it to NEC for approval.
“Once NEC approves it, the documents are sent back to NPC. We will then write up the contract and send it to the state solicitors again for legal clearance. After this is done, state solicitors sends it back to NPC who then sends it to the NEC for execution,” Bole said.
He said upon approval, the NEC would send the documents to the Governor-General to sign the contracts on behalf of the state.
Bole said tender processes took so long because of the required stringent steps and procedures.
He added that the public had the right to lay complaints against the awarding of Government contracts, provided they had the evidence to support their grouses.
Bole said the public, including organisations and associations like the National Doctor’s Association (NDA) could lodge complaints with the NPC if they were not happy with the awarding of contract/s but it must also provide supporting documents and evidence to back their grouses why the contract/s should be suspended or cancelled.
“And if the NPC finds enough evidence to entertain the grouses or complaints, we can suspend the contracts while an investigation is carried out,” he added.
Sir John Pundari
Sir John … PAC to probe why Australian Government withdrew its two-year $38 million funding programme for PNG in 2013
Despite the NDA’s furious response a day after the awarding of contracts was announced, the NDOH maintained that PNG needed to top up the supply of medical kits and antibiotics.
Kase said BPPL was awarded the two one year contracts to ensure that the country would not be hit by medicine shortages while a new contract was tendered.
Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC) chairman Sir John Pundari has announced that, among other controversies, the two government contracts awarded to BPPL would also be probed following a public outcry, including stakeholders in the health sector.
BPPL has been doing business with the NDOH since the 1980s. The company is registered with the Investment Promotion Authority (IPA) and is certified under the PNG Pharmacy Act.
This Act was passed after the millennium. BPPL gets its supplies from three off-shore manufacturing companies, including the controversial North China Pharmaceutical Corporation (NCPC) who were certified by the WHO in 2015 to manufacture and package medicine.
BPPL’s warehouse, storage site and cool room were inspected by the German ISO 9001 certification team and the company only got its ISO 9001 in 2014.
However, Sir John said that they would also be looking into why the Australian Government withdrew its two-year $38 million funding programme to supply drugs to some 3,000 health centres nationwide out of concern over the BPPL tender process in 2013.
“We will also be looking into finding out where the medicines are being sourced from and why there has been continuous continuous complaints and reports of medicine shortages every year despite the spending of huge allocations into public health services,” he said.
Garry Juffa
Juffa … complaints are not just coming from the public but also from hospital and aid post health officers
PAC deputy chairman Garry Juffa also says the health of the people is a priority and the Government must ensure that it is effective and services are reaching to everyone.
“The PAC inquiry notices have been served in response to the public outcry since the contracts were awarded to BPPL.
“We cannot work on rumors and allegations, so we are conducting the inquiry to collect information and review it.
“And the complaints are not just coming from the public but also from hospital and aid post health officers who have all spoken out against this. Even doctors have threatened to walk off their jobs.
“Year after year, bigger and bigger allocations are approved for the health sector, yet medicine shortages are a yearly issue,” he said.
Juffa said the PAC was mandated to protect the people and the public funds belong to the people.
“The PAC has given all three parties – NDOH, NPC and BPPL – 14 days to come forward with the information it has requested for the inquiry,” he added.
BPPL has denied allegations (not by The National) that the medicinal supplies procured by the company were substandard or fake.
The National has, since Aug 16, published follow-up news on why the Government should look into cheaper alternative ways to procure medical kits and supplies.
James Marape
Prime Minister James Marape had also, on Aug 18 told The National that the Government was reviewing and looking into alternative ways to improve its procurement and supply of medicines (pharmaceutical drugs) for the people.
“And we will be talking to donor partners, including Australia, on how best to procure and supply medicines in the country,” he added.
Marape said the two contracts awarded to BPPL was only for one year to ensure the country did not face shortages of medicine.
In 2017, online news portal PNGi published a three-part feature titled “Profiting from sickness: The dark economy of public health …”
The PNGi reports contain many details and damning allegations against BPPL.
Asked for clarifications and comments on the reports, BPPL Julia Y in an email response, copied to Fairfax Legal lawyer Keith Iduhu, to The National said:
“Firstly Publisher of PNGI are not known any legal action would be a futile exercise. The company take serious on this unfounded allegations and reserved its right to file court action when the identity of the publisher are known.
As to the sources of Borneo’s suppliers who are allegedly certify to only manufacture medicine for animal: Borneo categorically denies this assertion and advise that we source our medical supplies from NCPC International Corp., who are also the supplier of medicine to IDA. (please refer to IDA’s recent prove of purchase from NCPC international Corp. as attached). Noted that IDA is the preferred supplier of drugs whom the NDA has been advocating for.
We reserved the right to take legal action for any adverse, untruth and unfounded allegation made thus far.
Thank you.
Regards
Julia Y.
Borneo Pacific Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea” – sic
BPPL chairman Sir Martin Poh says: “We know the quality of the drugs that we are bringing into the country. There are reports alleging that the medical supplies procured are fake and that the contracts it was awarded last month were illegal.
“In August this year, we were awarded two contracts for the supply of Beta Lactam Antibiotics Drugs and the supply of 100 per cent Health Centre and Aid Post Kits in PNG.
“Since the award of the contracts, there have been numerous reports alleging that medicinal supplies procured by the company are, substandard and/or fake and the contracts are illegal.
“BPPL categorically denies the allegations made without substantive evidence to prove such claims.
“The NDA leveled similar allegations against BPPL after it was awarded a similar contract in 2013. Consequently, a team including NDA representatives and NDOH visited the two factories in China from which BPPL imported the medical kits.
“A report of that fact-finding mission concluded that BPPL’s arrangement with the NCPC is certified and internationally recognised.”
Sir Poh said NCPC also exported pharmaceutical drugs to Europe, the US, India and Africa and 80 countries and regions.
“It is also the first company in China to obtain the ISO 9001 Quality Management System Certification. The manufacturer is also recognised by the WHO and United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (Unicef).
“BPPL is not the only supplier to procure pharmaceutical medicine supplies from NCPC. The International Dispensary Association (IDA) also sources from NCPC,” Sir Poh stressed.
BPPL started operations in 1996, registering as a pharmaceutical company in PNG. It has since had a long association with the NDOH, private hospitals and other pharmaceutical suppliers in the country.
A supplier and distributor of health centre and aid post medical kits since 2000, WHO engaged a consultant in 2008 to review the content of the kits.
It must also be noted that medicinal products supplied to NDOH by local suppliers from companies or manufacturers from abroad are all prequalified by the NDOH based on the documentation supplied by agencies.
BPPL also attained ISO 9001: 2015 accreditation in 2014. A similar PAC inquiry was conducted in 2014.
The National had also conducted a random search on BPPL’s corporate website for more information on its corporate activities and history but could not find any.
Meanwhile, Sir John has invited the public and Members of Parliament to attend and witness inquiries into the NDOH, NPC and BPPL.
He said the PAC had issued “notice to produce”, pursuant to Section 23 (1) (b) of the Permanent Parliamentary Act to the NDOH, NPC and BPPL.

Chronology of news reports

Main Stories
The National (Sept 12, 2019):Medical kits supplied by BPPL are ready to be distributed to more than 2,000 health centres and aid posts nationwide, Kase says.
The National (Aug 22, 2019):The PAC announced that it will hold an inquiry into the recent K100 million worth of contract awards to BPPL to supply medical kits and antibiotics.
The National (Aug 20, 2019):The NAD and the Government, specifically the NDOH, appear to be heading for a “bruising showdown” over the country’s controversial procurement and supply of medicines (pharmaceutical drugs).
The National (Aug 19, 2019):
PM Marape says the Government is reviewing and looking into alternative ways to improve its procurement and supply of medicines (pharmaceutical drugs) for the people.
The National (Aug 16, 2019):
The NDA has questioned the Government’s rationale of awarding contracts to the private sector for the supply of medical kits and medicine.
The National (Aug 15, 2019):
BPPL has been awarded Government contracts to supply medical kits and antibiotics valued at more than K100 million.
The National (April 28, 2014):
(Then) Health Minister Michael Malabag has assured the country that imported medical supplies will be monitored for quality. He said in a statement that BPPL would be monitored “to ensure that we receive quality medicines”.
The National (April 4, 2014):The WHO says it does not recognise pharmaceutical companies. The NDA in an advertorial on April 4 stated that the NCPC and CSPC Pharmaceutical Group were recognised by WHO and Unicef and had received certification from various regulatory authorities, including the Chinese FDA, that the quality of their products procured by BPPL were assured.
The National (Jan 15, 2014):Northern Governor Garry Juffa, in Parliament, questioned (then) Health and HIV/AIDS Minister Michael Malabag whether BPPL was ISO (International Organisation for Standardisation)-compliant and if he was aware that the same company was responsible for the procurement and distribution of anti-venom for snake species not found in PNG.
Container loads of medical kits in BPPL’s warehouse ready for distribution to more than 2,000 health centres and aid posts in PNG. – Nationalpic by KENNEDY BANI
The National (Jan 15, 2014):(Then) Health Minister Michael Malabag has assured the country that imported medical supplies will be monitored for quality. He said in a statement that BPPL would be monitored “to ensure that we receive quality medicines”.
PNG ATTITUDE (Jan 31, 2014):
It all began back in September last year when (then) PNG prime minister Peter O’Neill announced that the BPPL … would be given a contract to supply PNG pharmaceuticals. Australian foreign minister Julie Bishop then announced that her government would not support this decision as BPPL did not have the ISO 9001 quality rating and this implied their procurement methods were not up to a standard where they could be trusted to maintain a supply of good quality drugs. There had been a history of trouble in the supply of medical kits and Australia had come to PNG’s aid and contributed millions of kina to aid their distribution
The National (Dec 31, 2013):
The PAC banned the media from covering the inquiry.
The National (Dec 30, 2013):
The process involved in the issuing of the K71 million contract to BPPL by the NDOH and Tenders Board was done as a matter of convenience, the PAC hearing found … PAC chairman and Bogia Member of Parliament John Hickey said the inquiry did not find any evidence of foul play as claimed by media reports and critics.
ABC News (Dec 26, 2013):Australia has withdrawn funding for a $38 million programme that supplies medicine to PNG health centres, due to concerns about the way PNG has awarded contracts.
The National (Nov 27, 2013):
(Then) Health and HIV Minister Michael Malabag led a delegation to Malaysia’s capital Kuala Lumpur to inspect facilities where medical kits and pharmaceutical drugs are contracted by BPPL. The delegation included Health Secretary Pascoe Kase, department officials and National Doctors Association president James Naipao.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Growing unemployment rate in Papua New Guinea

Sugu Valley tribal war death toll rises to at least 30

Sorcery shame for Papua New Guinea in X’mas