Hohola land belongs to TST Group
News that matter in Papua New Guinea
Hohola land belongs to
TST Group
PORT MORESBY: The National Court has ruled that a piece
of land in Hohola (Allotment 22, Section 250) in the National Capital District
belongs to TST Development Ltd.
Judge Oagile Key Dingake
then quashed Physical Planning Minister Justin Tkachenko’s decision to forfeit
the TST Group’s property.
Details of yesterday (May 11, 2022)’s court proceedings were published by The National:
Land remains with TST
Group
May 12, 2022The
NationalMain Stories
A DECISION by Lands and Physical Planning
Minister Justin Tkatchenko to forfeit a piece of land belonging to TST
Development Ltd was quashed by the National Court due to notice being served to
the wrong address.
Judge Oagile Key Dingake said that based on evidence, at the time of the
forfeiture, the land situated at Allotment 22 Section 250 at Hohola in Port
Moresby, was developed.
TST Development Ltd filed an application in the National Court appealing
against Tkatchenko’s decision on Oct 9, 2017, to forfeit TST’s title to a State
lease described as Allotment 22, Section 250, Hohola, National Capital
District.
“With respect to the notice to show cause, I find that the notice to show cause
was sent to the wrong address,” Judge Dingake said.
“The net effect of my findings of fact and the legal prescriptions referred to
above, means in effect, that the forfeiture of the land in question was
unlawful, and so I find.
“Having regard to the conclusion, I have reached on this matter, it is not
necessary to consider or discuss the other grounds relied upon by the TST
Development Ltd to set aside the forfeiture decision of Tkatchenko.”
Judge Dingake allowed the appeal and quashed Tkatchenko’s decision of Oct 9,
2017.
The court ordered the Registrar of Titles and secretary, Department of Lands
and Physical Planning, to rectify and maintain their records on the Registrar
of Lands to reflect TST Development Ltd as the registered lessee of the
property within seven days for the order.
He also ordered that TST Development Ltd be notified through writing.
Judge Dingake also ordered that TST Development Ltd’s cost of the proceeding be
paid by the respondents on a party to party basis.
He said the property was forfeited on two main grounds; that TST Development
Ltd had failed to develop the property as required by the development covenant
of the lease and that TST Development Ltd had failed to respond to the notice
to show cause issued by Tkatchenko and Oswald Tolopa, acting secretary for the
Department of Lands and Physical Planning.
TST Development Ltd’s position was that Tkatchenko and Tolopa were not entitled
to forfeit the property. This is because it was developed by the time the
forfeiture was effected.
“With respect to failure to show cause, TST Development Ltd contends that
Tkatchenko and Tolopa sent the notice to the wrong address, and that as a result
it does not constitute proper notice.
“Evidence also shows that TST Development Ltd became aware of the notice
outside the required one month period and responded to it but was informed that
the land had already been forfeited.
“It is common cause that the original title to the above piece of land changed
hands on many occasions and TST Development Ltd eventually assumed title in
1994.”
In 2013, TST Development Ltd entered into a contract of sale with Global
Customs Forwarding Ltd, but the sale was not approved by the minister.
It is a matter of record that Tkatchenko and Tolopa before triggering the
forfeiture process, on or about Oct 9, 2015, carried out a physical inspection
of the land in question for purposes of verifying whether it was developed as
required by the lease covenant.
The physical inspection showed that the land was developed.
Comments
Post a Comment