Bhosip Kaiwi’s appeal for freedom denied by Supreme Court
News that matter in Papua New Guinea
Bhosip Kaiwi’s appeal for
freedom denied by Supreme Court
PORT MORESBY: The Supreme Court has refused an
application by Bhosip Kaiwi to appeal a National Court decision last year
questioning the legality of his detention in Bomana Prison.
Justice David Cannings
granted leave yesterday (April 3, 2022) on grounds that the Supreme Court did
not have the power and that it was not in the interest of justice.
“There has got to be a
pathway to seek leave for appeal. It is not provided,” he added.
Justice Cannings said
Kaiwi needed to continue with trial in the National Court and appeal against
conviction or sentence for murder.
The court proceedings were published by The National:
Kaiwi’s application
refused
May 4, 2022The
NationalMain Stories
THE Supreme Court has refused an application
by Bhosip Kaiwi to appeal a National Court decision last year questioning the
legality of his detention at Bomana prison.
Justice David Cannings granted leave yesterday on the grounds that the Supreme
Court did not have the power and that it was not in the interest of justice.
“There’s got to be a pathway to seek leave to appeal,” he said.
“It’s not provided.”
Kaiwi filed an application by way of a notice of motion in the National Court
last Oct 21 for the court to determine the legality of his detention given that
he had not been charged with murder.
On Nov 19, the State argued that Kaiwi was legally detained because section 32
of the District Court Act allowed for the amendment of the charge from wilful
murder to murder.
Therefore, Section 61A (3) of the District Court Act which required a discharge
of Kaiwi was not applicable as he was legally detained under the new charge of
murder.
Kaiwi through his lawyer Emmanuel Elison argued that the custody order was
defective.
A National Court judge found that there was no evidence before the court
supporting Kaiwi’s argument of the procedure taken and subsequently formed the
view that the Committal Court magistrate was correct in her interpretation of
the District Court Act. The National Court judge then dismissed Kaiwi’s notice
of motion.
Elison by way of background submitted yesterday that Kaiwi was not discharged from
custody when the Committal Court magistrate granted the application by police
to withdraw the charge of wilful murder and substitute it with murder.
He further submitted that Kaiwi was unlawfully detained when the amendments
were made to the charges.
Elison argued that Kaiwi should have been discharged and arraigned again for
the charge of murder, however this was not done.
He added that the court needed to grant leave to appeal and order that Kaiwi be
discharged and stay the proceeding pending determination of this appeal.
The State submitted among other grounds that leave could not be granted because
there was no arguable case as per the transcript of the National Court, the
judge was correct, and that Kaiwi did not provide transcript of the Committal Court
proceeding.
Justice Cannings in refusing to grant leave said that there was an arguable
case but it would not be in the interest of justice.
He added that Kaiwi needed to continue with trial in the National Court and
appeal against conviction or sentence.
“I refuse to grant leave due to the Supreme Court having no jurisdiction to
entertain the appeal in that position, contradicts the interest of justice.”
The court also ordered that the file be closed.
Comments
Post a Comment