Sanctuary Hotel’s Jamie Pang denied bail again
News that matter in Papua New Guinea
Sanctuary Hotel
operations manager Jamie Pang
Sanctuary Hotel’s Jamie
Pang denied bail again
PORT MORESBY: The National Court in Waigani has agin
refused bail for Sanctuary Hotel operations manager Jamie Png, ruling that
there was no evidence to support his application on medical and family grounds.
Justice Laura Wawun-Kuvi
yesterday (March 8, 2022), told the 43-year-old Australian, charged with
breaching his visa conditions and rape, that if he had relied on medical
grounds for bail, he should provide proper and current medical evidence.
Details of the court proceedings were published by The National:
Court refuses Pang’s
bail
March 9, 2022The
NationalMain Stories
By SCHOLAR KASSAS
THE Waigani National
Court has refused bail for detained Sanctuary Hotel operations manager Jamie
Pang, saying there was no evidence to support his application on medical and
family grounds.
Acting judge Laura Wawun-Kuvi yesterday told the Australian, 43, charged with
breaching his visa conditions and rape, that if he had relied on medical
grounds for bail, he should provide proper and current medical evidence.
“Whilst the strict rules of evidence do not apply, the court must be presented
with evidence by a medical doctor as to factors such as diagnosis, treatment,
and seriousness of the illness,” she said.
“As it is, there is very little before this court in support of this ground.”
Justice Kuvi said that on grounds of family welfare, there was also no evidence
presented before the court.
“The applicant does not dispose in his affidavit that his family will suffer
hardship because of his imprisonment,” she said.
“He (Pang) only states that he is employed by the hotel and his family lived
with him.
“Family suffering are consequences of being arrested and detained for an
offence and do not form a ground for bail.”
On other grounds such as being denied access to see his lawyer, Justice Kuvi
said this was not such a case where Pang had reused his right to see a lawyer.
The applicant in the affidavit confirmed that he had spoken to his lawyers, she
said. Justice Kuvi said that further factors such as Pang not being a risk to
flyaway and that his passport had been confiscated by the court were also not
grounds for bail.
In relation to Pang’s compliance with previous bail conditions, Justice Kuvi
added that he did not state the nature of the charges and dates and times he
was charged and acquitted.
“And more importantly, drawing a distinction, a comparison, between those
charges and the present case, I do not accept that as the basis to granting
bail,” she said.
Comments
Post a Comment