Education Minister Uguro’s application to dismiss election petition rejected
News that matter in Papua New Guinea
Education Minister Uguro’s application to
dismiss election petition rejected
PORT MORESBY: The National Court has refused Usino-Bundi
MP and Education Minister Jimmy Uguro’s application to dismiss an election
petition against him, given that there were serious allegations contained in
it.
“In this case, the
petition presents serious allegations of illegal practices, undue influence,
and errors and omissions in the election process,” Judge Joseph Yagi said.
The court proceedings were published by The National:
Court refuses Uguro
bid
November 10, 2022The
NationalMain Stories
By
CLARISSA MOI
THE National Court has refused an
application by Usino-Bundi MP Jimmy Uguro to dismiss an election petition
against him, given that there were serious allegations contained in it.
“In this case, the petition presents serious allegations of illegal practices,
undue influence, and errors and omissions in the election process,” Judge
Joseph Yagi said.
He made the ruling at Waigani yesterday in the petition by Vincent Kumura
against Uguro and the Electoral Commission (EC).
Uguro had sought to dismiss the petition because Kumura had failed to comply
with court directions.
Judge Yagi noted that the power to dismiss an election petition under the
election petition rules was discretionary.
On Oct 27, Uguro’s lawyer Maleva Kipa submitted that there were several instances
where Kumura did not comply with court orders which included breaching of
election petition rules by not attending court on the first directions hearing
on Oct 7.
Kipa pointed out that election petitions were serious matters and courts needed
to take a serious approach in terms of prosecution.
He added that in this instance, there was non-compliance with both the court’s
orders and election petition rules.
Kipa said on Oct 7, Kumura did not attend the first directions hearing as per
the election petition rules.
Further, the orders of Oct 7 was for Kumara to prepare and circulate the draft
orders to parties by Oct 14. That did not happen.
Kipa added that when the matter last came to court on Oct 21, the orders of Oct
7 were extended.
Kumura’s lawyer Timil Tape argued that the orders of Oct 7 were extended to
allow them to serve necessary documents on EC.
He added that the only issue was the non-compliance of circulating draft
directions which was settled on Oct 22 where he had paid costs to Uguro and EC.
Judge Yagi noted that while the order of Oct 7 was breached it was remedied on
Oct 22 by extending time and ordering costs against Kumura’s lawyer.
“The power of the court under rule 18 of the election petition rules must be
used sparingly and is to be exercised as a last resort and in very clear
instances where Kumura has intentionally and blatantly disrespected a court
order,” he said.
“The evidence before the court does not amount to intentional and blatant
breach of court order,” Judge Yagi said.
Comments
Post a Comment